« Circumcision as a once and future risk ... | Main | Technologies diagnosed recently under Jewish law... »

September 22, 2005

Comments

Daniel

The Soncino translates, "...and throw [Raba's duck's] entrails to a cat," with the note that it was Yom Tov and the entrails would not have been eaten then, though they could have been eaten on the previous day. Is the original less like "intestines" than "viscera"?
Heimish of Raba to have cats around.

adderabbi

the blood of the blood-let beast doesn't protect against impurity; rather, since the goal of the letting was to heal the body, and not because you wanted the blood, the blood itself is not 'mekabel tumah', i.e., not a conductor of tum'ah like it would be under normal circumstances.

Agence de mannequins Paris

Nice Article! It is really a good blog. I am completely convinced with his thoughts. I will stay in touch for more information. Thanks for sharing.

Tough Mudder

Very interesting post. Great blog !
Nice thoughts, very convincing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

March 2007

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Blog cosmos

  • Jewish Blogging


  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

  • Listed on 
BlogShares





  • <<List
    Jewish Bloggers
    Join>>
Blog powered by Typepad

Google and Newswire


  • Google
    %(domain)s %(domain)s